RATS: An Alternative Solution for Tracking Open Field Locomotion of Rats with Spinal Cord Injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v21n4.3848Keywords:
Locomotion, open field test, rat, spinal cord injury, trackingAbstract
Changes in locomotion for animals under various health conditions including spinal cord injuries (SCI) provide insights on the disease and its recovery process. This can be achieved by analyzing their behavior in an open field test (OFT). Existing systems for OFT study are expensive and lack customization options, making it unsuitable for research projects with limited means. This study introduces Rodent Activity Tracking System (RATS), a new OFT system with automatic tracking and analysis to objectively assess the behavior of rats with SCI in comparison to healthy rats, focusing on distance traveled in the arena. 13 adults female Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups – uninjured (7) and injured (6). For the injured group, contusion SCI was introduced on their T9/T10 thoracic area of the spinal cord using NYU Impactor device. The reliability of the newly developed system was compared with manual measurement, achieving a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.9979 for internal consistency. The accuracy of the distance measured by the system showed no significant difference compared to the manual method, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.9909 and a Pearson correlation, r, of 0.9924. Bland-Altman analysis portrayed similar results with most measurements falling within 95% range. RATS demonstrates its capability by successfully measuring the average distance traveled by the rats, with the healthy rats covering on average 70% more distance than SCI-injured rats. This suggests that RATS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring the locomotor behavior of rats in OFT.
References
Wilkinson, Aceves, M., Dietz, V. A., Dulin, J. N., Jeffery, U., & Jeffery, N. D. (2020). An analysis of variability in ‘catwalk’ locomotor measurements to aid experimental design and interpretation. ENeuro, 7(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0092-20.2020
Engkasan, J. P., Hasnan, N., Mohd Yusuf, Y., & Abdul Latif, L. (2017). People with spinal cord injury in Malaysia. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 96(2), S90–S92. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000598
Roohi, S. A., Naicker, A. S., Shukur, M. H., & Mohammad, A. R. (2006). Spinal injuries in a level-one trauma centre: A demographic study. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 61, 30–35.
Zulkipli, Z. H., & Faudzi, S. A. M. (2020). Spine and whiplash injuries related to passenger car crashes in Malaysia. www.journal.saemalaysia.org.my
Sultan, I., et al. (2020). The safety and efficacy of steroid treatment for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03414
Ibrahim, A., et al. (2013). Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in hospital Kuala Lumpur. Spine, 38(5), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826ef594
Swearengen, J. R. (2018). Choosing the right animal model for infectious disease research. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 1(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12020
Yang, T., Dai, Y. J., Chen, G., & Cui, S. S. (2020). Dissecting the dual role of the glial scar and scar-forming astrocytes in spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00078
Zheng, G., et al. (2021). The catwalk XT® gait analysis is closely correlated with tissue damage after cervical spinal cord injury in rats. Applied Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094097
Hickman, D. L., Johnson, J., Vemulapalli, T. H., Crisler, J. R., & Shepherd, R. (2017). Commonly used animal models. In Principles of animal research for graduate and undergraduate students (pp. 117–175). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802151-4.00007-4
Sharif-Alhoseini, M., et al. (2017). Animal models of spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.187
Cheriyan, T., et al. (2014). Spinal cord injury models: A review. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.91
Mukherjee, P., Roy, S., Ghosh, D., & Nandi, S. K. (2022). Role of animal models in biomedical research: A review. Laboratory Animal Research, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1
Crispim Junior, C. F., Pederiva, C. N., Bose, R. C., Garcia, V. A., Lino-de-Oliveira, C., & Marino-Neto, J. (2012). ETHOWATCHER: Validation of a tool for behavioral and video-tracking analysis in laboratory animals. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 42 (2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.12.002
Gravel, P., Tremblay, M., Leblond, H., Rossignol, S., & de Guise, J. A. (2010). A semi-automated software tool to study treadmill locomotion in the rat: From experiment videos to statistical gait analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.05.006
Jahkel, M., Rilke, O., Koch, R., & Oehler, J. (2000). Open field locomotion and neurotransmission in mice evaluated by principal component factor analysis-Effects of housing condition, individual activity disposition and psychotropic drugs. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 24(1), 61–84.
Jacobs, B. Y., et al. (2018). The Open Source GAITOR Suite for Rodent Gait Analysis. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28134-1
Zheng, G., et al. (2023). Assessment of hindlimb motor recovery after severe thoracic spinal cord injury in rats: classification of CatWalk XT® gait analysis parameters. Neural Regeneration Research, 18(5), 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.355763
Schiaveto-de-Souza, A., da-Silva, C. A., Defino, H. L. A., & Del Bel, E. A. (2013). Effect of melatonin on the functional recovery from experimental traumatic compression of the spinal cord. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 46(4), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20132322
Drevet, S., Favier, B., Brun, E., Gavazzi, G., & Lardy, B. (2022). Mouse models of osteoarthritis: A summary of models and outcomes assessment. American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000043
Seibenhener, M. L., & Wooten, M. C. (2015). Use of the open field maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 96, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3791/52434
Basso, D. M., Beattie, M. S., & Bresnahan, J. C. (1995). A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. Journal of Neurotrauma, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1995.12.1
Diogo, C. C., et al. (2019). Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis to evaluate functional recovery in thoracic spinal cord injured rats. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.027
Patar, M. N. A. A., Mali, M., Mohd Ramli, M. H., Makhtar, A. K., & Mahmud, J. (2011). Simulation and performance evaluation of a new type of powered dynamic ankle foot orthosis. 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering, 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2011.6163709
Kiziltan, E., & Aydin, L. (2020). An alternative low-cost solution for tracking laboratory animals. Gazi Medical Journal, 31(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.2020.37
Bounds, H. A., Poeta, D. L., Klinge, P. M., & Burwell, R. D. (2019). Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings (PrAnCER): A low-cost, open-access automated gait analysis system for assessing motor deficits in the rat. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 150.
Mendes, C. S., Bartos, I., Márka, Z., Akay, T., Márka, S., & Mann, R. S. (2015). Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking rodents. BMC Biology, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0154-0
Mendes, C. S., Bartos, I., Akay, T., Márka, S., & Mann, R. S. (2013). Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking wild type and sensory deprived Drosophila melanogaster. Elife, 2013(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00231
Gould, T. D., Dao, D. T., & Kovacsics, C. E. (2009). The Open Field Test. In T. D. Gould (Ed.), Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice (Vol. 42, pp. 1–20). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-303-9
Sturman, O., Germain, P. L., & Bohacek, J. (2018). Exploratory rearing: A context- and stress-sensitive behavior recorded in the open-field test. Stress, 21(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2018.1438405
Walsh, R. N., & Cummins, R. A. (1976). The Open-Field Test: A Critical Review.
Sri-Iesaranusorn, P., et al. (2020). Quantification analysis of behavioral changes after sciatic nerve ligation in rats.
Verma, R., Virdi, J. K., Singh, N., & Jaggi, A. S. (2019). Animals models of spinal cord contusion injury. Korean Pain Society. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.1.12
Yan, R., et al. (2022). A modified impactor for establishing a graded contusion spinal cord injury model in rats. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10(8), 436–436. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5851
Jarragh, A., Shuaib, A., Al-Khaledi, G., Alotaibi, F., Al-Sabah, S., & Masocha, W. (2023). A custom-made weight-drop impactor to produce consistent spinal cord injury outcomes in a rat model. Translational Neuroscience, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0287
Yusof, Y., Patar, M. N. A. A., Patar, A., & Mahmud, J. (2025). A novel walkway system for measuring the spatial gait parameters of rats with spinal cord injury. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 17(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2025.17.01.008
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of Image Analysis.
Sakiyama, Y., Sujaku, T., & Furuta, A. (2008). A novel automated method for measuring the effect of analgesics on formalin-evoked licking behavior in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 167(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.003
Zhang, X., Jenkins, G. J., Hakim, C. H., Duan, D., & Yao, G. (2022). Four-limb wireless IMU sensor system for automatic gait detection in canines. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08676-1
Doğan, N. Ö. (2018). Bland-Altman analysis: A paradigm to understand correlation and agreement. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(4), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.09.001
Koob, A. O., Cirillo, J., & Babbs, C. F. (2006). A novel open field activity detector to determine spatial and temporal movement of laboratory animals after injury and disease. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 157(2), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.04.020
Kloos, A. D., Fisher, L. C., Detloff, M. R., Hassenzahl, D. L., & Basso, D. M. (2005). Stepwise motor and all-or-none sensory recovery is associated with nonlinear sparing after incremental spinal cord injury in rats. Experimental Neurology, 191(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.09.016
Hamers, F. P. T., Koopmans, G. C., & Joosten, E. A. J. (2006). CatWalk-Assisted Gait Analysis in the Assessment of Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 23(3–4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2006.23.537
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yaakob Yusof, Mohd Nor Azmi Ab Patar, Azim Patar, Chi Hieu Le, Jamaluddin Mahmud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
