Ideal Spot for Photovoltaic Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (PEVCS) in Malaysia: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v21n4.3776Keywords:
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), criteria, photovoltaic electric vehicle charging stations (PEVCS), MalaysiaAbstract
The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in Malaysia is progressing rapidly, and the development of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs) is following suit. Despite this growth, the integration of solar power into these stations remains limited. To address this, it is essential to consider various criteria and parameters when selecting ideal locations for photovoltaic electric vehicle charging stations (PEVCSs) in Malaysia. This study aims to identify suitable locations for PEVCSs using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The AHP method evaluates the weightage of criteria based on the judgments of seven experts from diverse fields, ensuring a multidisciplinary perspective. Six main criteria and twelve sub-criteria are assessed, drawing from comprehensive literature, needs analysis, and instrument validation. The results demonstrate that the consistency ratio (CR) for all pairwise comparisons is below 0.1, reflecting high reliability and consistency. 'Economy' emerged as the most influential and critical criterion, with a weight of 0.226210. Following closely is 'Proximity' with a weight of 0.208390 and 'Technology' with a weight of 0.205632. Finally, the findings are expected to offer valuable insights for policy makers and industry stakeholders, facilitating informed decision-making in the planning and development of sustainable charging infrastructure in Malaysia.
References
Liu, H., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Li, J., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Electric vehicle charging station location model considering charging choice behavior and range anxiety. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074213
Raja Ma’amor Shah, R. N. F. A., Abdul Rahim, H., & Azmar, N. A. S. (2024). A network model of electric vehicles charging station (EVCS) in Malaysia. Semarak International Journal of Electronic System Engineering, 1(1), 46–59.
Hisoglu, S., & Comert, R. (2021). GIS-based optimum site selection for solar electric vehicle charging station: Ankara-Istanbul highway case. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 46(4/W5-2021), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-Archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-267-2021
Raja Ma’amor Shah, R. N. F. A., Mohamad Rusidi, F. S., & Azmar, N. A. S. (2024). Trends towards the demand of electric vehicles based on the distribution of electric vehicle charging stations in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Vehicle System, 1(1), 1–6.
Syahirah, N. A., & Farah, R. N. (2024). Charging ahead: Statistics on electric vehicle charging station allocation and uptake trends in Malaysia. Applied Mathematics and Computational Intelligence, 13(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58915/amci.v13iNo.1.259
International Energy Agency. (2024). Malaysia - Countries & Regions. https://www.iea.org/countries/malaysia/emissions
Tekin, S., Guner, E. D., Cilek, A., & Unal Cilek, M. (2021). Selection of renewable energy systems sites using the MaxEnt model in the Eastern Mediterranean region in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(37), 51405–51424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13760-6
Bilal, M., Ahmad, F., & Rizwan, M. (2023). Techno-economic assessment of grid and renewable powered electric vehicle charging stations in India using a modified metaheuristic technique. Energy Conversion and Management, 284(April), 116995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116995
Kumar, V., Teja, V. R., Singh, M., & Mishra, S. (2019). PV based off-grid charging station for electric vehicle. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(4), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.211
Raja Ma’amor Shah, R. N. F. A., Azmar, N. A. S., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abd Karim, N. S., Md Husin, N. H., Misron, N., & Utami, N. S. (2024). Sustainable urban planning: Criteria for efficient photovoltaic electric vehicle charging stations deployment in Malaysia. Semarak International Journal of Electronic System Engineering, 1(1), 35–45.
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
Gebre, S. L., Cattrysse, D., & Van Orshoven, J. (2021). Multi-criteria decision-making methods to address water allocation problems: A systematic review. Water (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020125
Kencana, C. (2024). Decision support system for manufacturing division priority using AHP method. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 8(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v8i1.7079
Singha, C., Swain, K. C., & Swain, S. K. (2020). Best crop rotation selection with GIS-AHP technique using soil nutrient variability. Agriculture (Switzerland), 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060213
Madzík, P., & Falát, L. (2022). State-of-the-art on Analytic Hierarchy Process in the last 40 years: Literature review based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 17, Issue 5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268777
Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba, S., & Esztergar-Kiss, D. (2023). A Systematic review of Analytic Hierarchy Process applications to solve transportation problems: From 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11(January), 11973–11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234298
Kang, Y. O., Yabar, H., Mizunoya, T., & Higano, Y. (2024). Optimal landfill site selection using ArcGIS multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Kinshasa City. Environmental Challenges, 14(December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100826
Alwedyan, S. (2024). Optimal location selection of a casual-dining restaurant using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.14246/IRSPSD.12.1_156
Enkhtuya, D., Sukhbaatar, U., & Galsandorj, A. (2024). Solving location selection of Urban Consolidation Center by using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 15, 1350–1365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.15.1350
Jain, K. S. M., Gupta, S., Khandelwal, S., & Agrawal, S. (2023). Analytic Hierarchy Process in hotel sector. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 8(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2023.v07i12.012
Abdullah, M. M., & Asmael, N. M. (2023). Analytic Hierarchy Process for evaluation of transportation alternatives on the Karkh side of Baghdad. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 27(6), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.27.6.8
Srebrenkoska, S., Apostolova, A., Dzidrov, M., & Krstev, D. (2023). Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the selection of a flexible production system. Engineering World, 5, 138–143. https://doi.org/10.37394/232025.2023.5.15
Nurjaman, I., & Andika Listyantoko, R. (2023). Analytic Hierarchy Process for determination of decision making in the selection of contractors. Industry Xplore, 8(1), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.36805/teknikindustri.v8i1.5104
Borri, V. de M., Gasi, F., & Akkari, A. (2022). Analytics Hierarchy Process for decision-making in network infrastructure replacement. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 9(9), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.99.39
Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Reynolds, K. M., Lakicevic, M., & Zdero, S. (2022). Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best–Worst Method in group evaluation of urban park quality. Forests, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020290
Li, G., & Gao, W. (2022). Achievement prediction of English majors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Genetic Algorithm. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6542300
wang, h. (2021). research on decision Making Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process in selecting and appointing persons. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452446.3452735
Siekelova, A., Podhorska, I., & Imppola, J. J. (2021). Analytic Hierarchy Process in multiple–criteria decision–making: A model example. SHS Web of Conferences, 90, 01019. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219001019
Abdul Rahman, N. D., Mersing, E. F., Mohd Yazid, N. S. S., & Mahad, N. F. (2021). An integrated approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (AHP-DEMATEL) to solve the supplier selection problem. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11155
Tang, J. (2021). Prioritizing user requirements based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1861. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1861/1/012021
Kumar, P., & Channi, H. K. (2024). Optimal electric vehicle charging station placement: A multi-criteria decision-making approach for site selection. 2nd International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Communication Systems, ICICACS 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICACS60521.2024.10498237
Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Hezam, I. M., & Sallam, K. M. (2023). Sustainability assessment of optimal location of electric vehicle charge stations: A conceptual framework for green energy into smart cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03373-z
Sisman, A. (2023). Identification of suitable sites for electric vehicle charging stations; A Geographical Information Systems based multi criteria decision making approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 45(2), 4017–4030. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2200740
Zhao, H., Gao, J., & Cheng, X. (2023). Electric vehicle solar charging station siting study based on GIS and multi-criteria decision-making: A case study of China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410967
Priefer, J., & Steiger, L. (2022). Designing a GIS-AHP-based spatial decision support system for discovering and visualizing suitable locations for electric vehicle charging stations. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2022
Ghodusinejad, M. H., Noorollahi, Y., & Zahedi, R. (2022). Optimal site selection and sizing of solar EV charge stations. Journal of Energy Storage, 56, 105904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105904
Sisman, S., Ergul, I., & Aydinoglu, A. C. (2021). Designing GIS-based site selection model for urban investment planning in smart cities with the case of electric vehicle charging stations. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 46, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-Archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-515-2021
Feng, J., Xu, S. X., & Li, M. (2021). A novel multi-criteria decision-making method for selecting the site of an electric-vehicle charging station from a sustainable perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65(December 2020), 102623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102623
Karolemeas, C., Tsigdinos, S., Tzouras, P. G., Nikitas, A., & Bakogiannis, E. (2021). Determining electric vehicle charging station location suitability: A qualitative study of Greek stakeholders employing thematic analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042298
Lee, B. H., Jung, S. J., Sung, J. H., Kwon, O. kyu, & Kim, B. S. (2021). Selection of charging sites for electric vehicles in the Republic of Korea based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 79(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00128-9
Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research design. Archives of Business Research, 8(11), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9042
Farah, R. N., Syahirah, N. A., Misron, N., Azmi, M. S. M., Karim, N. S. A., & Husin, M. (2023). A need analysis of the criteria involved in determining suitable locations for photovoltaic electric vehicle charging stations in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 19, 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v19n6.3114
Islam, R., Anis, A., & Azam, M. S. E. (2024). Revitalizing university performance evaluation: The case of SETARA model in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0561
Şahin, M., & Yurdugül, H. (2018). A content analysis study on the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process in educational studies. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.373784
Rouyendegh (B. Erdebilli), B. D., Doğru, C. I., & Aybirdi, C. B. (2019). A comparison of different multi-criteria analyses for electric vehicle charging station deployment. Communications in Mathematics and Applications, 10(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.26713/cma.v10i1.1126
Wu, Y., Xie, C., Xu, C., & Li, F. (2017). A decision framework for electric vehicle charging station site selection for residential communities under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case of Beijing. Energies, 10(9), 1270. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091270
Sun, L. (2020). Site selection for EVCSs by GIS-based AHP method. E3S Web of Conferences, 194, 05051. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019405051
Yagmahan, B., & Yılmaz, H. (2023). An integrated ranking approach based on group multi-criteria decision making and sensitivity analysis to evaluate charging stations under sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02044-1
Kaya, Ö., Tortum, A., Alemdar, K. D., & Çodur, M. Y. (2020). Site selection for EVCS in Istanbul by GIS and multi-criteria decision-making. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 80(December 2019), 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102271
Hisoglu, S., Tuominen, A., & Huovila, A. (2023). An approach for selecting optimal locations for electric vehicle solar charging stations. IET Smart Cities, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12058
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590D
Ali, S. A., Parvin, F., Al-Ansari, N., Pham, Q. B., Ahmad, A., Raj, M. S., Anh, D. T., Ba, L. H., & Thai, V. N. (2021). Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: A case study of Memari Municipality, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 7528–7550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11004-7
Aczél, J., & Alsina, C. (1986). On synthesis of judgements. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci, 20(6), 333–339.
Aczél, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). The procedure for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2001.10697924
Brunelli, M. (2019). A study on the anonymity of pairwise comparisons in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(2), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.006
Al Amin, M., Das, A., Roy, S., & Imran Shikdar, M. (2019). Warehouse selection problem solution by using proper MCDM process. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 5(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20190502.13
Bedir, N., Özder, E. H., & Eren, T. (2016). Course selection with AHP & PROMETHEE methods for post graduate students: An application in Kirikkale University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. MATEC Web of Conferences, 68, 20004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166820004
Norddin, N. I., Ibrahim, K., & Aziz, A. H. (2012). Selecting new lecturers using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396585
Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in Geographic Information Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024, November 13). Demographic Statistics, Third Quarter 2024. Dosm.gov.my. https://www.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/demographic-statistics-third-quarter-2024
Nazri, E. M., Balhuwaisl, M., & Kasim, M. M. (2016). A pre-evaluation step towards a guaranteed consistent AHP-based pairwise comparison. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences ISSN, 4(1), 73–80.
Janchomphu, W., Pannucharoenwong, N., Hemathulin, S., Echaroj, S., & Iamtrakul, P. (2024). Suitability factors for electric vehicle charging stations using analytic hierarchy process: a case study in Chonburi Thailand. Engineered Science, 29, 1110. https://dx.doi.org/10.30919/es1110
Genevois, M. E., & Kocaman, H. (2018). Locating electric vehicle charging stations in Istanbul with AHP based mathematical modelling. International Journal of Transportation Systems, 3.
Aqidawati, E. F., & Nafi’ah, R. (2023). Selection of charging station location based on sustainability perspective using AHP method. Jurnal Tekno, 20(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.33557/jtekno.v20i1.2332
Farah, R. N., & Syahirah, N. A. (2024). Towards sustainable mobility: Identifying ideal locations for photovoltaic electric charging stations (PEVCS) in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 112(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37934.ard.112.1.18
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 N.A. SYAHIRAH, R.N. FARAH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
