Ultrasound imaging characterization on tissue mimicking materials for cardiac tissue phantom: Texture analysis perspective

Authors

  • Nurul Shafiqa Mohd Yusof Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Dyah Ekashanti Octorina Dewi Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Ahmad ‘Athif Mohd Faudzi Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Nurulazirah Md Salih Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Norzailin Abu Bakar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Hamzaini Abdul Hamid Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v13n4-2.822

Keywords:

Cardiac tissue phantom, Tissue Mimicking Materials, Ultrasound imaging, Texture analysis, Silicone rubber

Abstract

Cardiac tissue phantom is a synthetic physical model to mimic the characteristics of actual cardiac tissues. Tissue Mimicking Materials have been widely used as materials for medical imaging phantom. In cardiac ultrasound imaging, phantoms have been used for system verification, simulation and training for cardiovascular radiography. In this study, we aimed to characterize the structure of cardiac tissue phantom by performing ultrasound imaging and texture analysis. The phantom samples were developed by mixing Silicone Rubber with Calcium Carbonate in different percentages. Ultrasound imaging with various Dynamic Range settings (30, 60, and 90 dB) was used to scan the phantom samples. First-, Second-, and Higher order Statistical Texture Analyses were used to quantify structural features of the phantom samples. As comparison, one ultrasound image of adult heart was also characterized. The results show that the addition of Calcium Carbonate affected the imaging structure of the phantom samples. Textural comparison with the ultrasound image of adult heart confirmed that phantom with Silicon Rubber and 8% of Calcium carbonate had closest texture features.

References

Bharati M. H., Liu J. J. & MacGregor J. F., 2004. Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 72(1), pp.57–71.

Chappard D., Guggenbuhl P., Legrand E., Basle M. F., Audran M., 2005. Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs is correlated with bone histomorphometry. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 23(1), pp.24–29.

Chen R. & Shih A. J., 2013. Multi-modality gellan gum-based tissue-mimicking phantom with targeted mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58(16), pp.5511–5525.

Culjat M.O., Goldenberg D., Tewari P., Singh R. S., 2010. A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 36(6), pp.861–873.

Depeursinge A., Foncubierta-Rodrique A., Van De Ville D., Muller H., 2014. Three-dimensional solid texture analysis in biomedical imaging: Review and opportunities. Medical Image Analysis, 18(1), pp.176–196.

Gao S., Peng Y., Guo H., Liu W., Gao T., Xu Y., Tang X., 2014. Texture analysis and classification of ultrasound liver images. Bio-medical materials and engineering, 24(1), pp.1209–1216.

Gebejes A., Huertas R., 2013. Texture characterization based on grey-level co-occurrence matrix. Conference of Informatics and Management Sciences, 25-29 March 2013, Slovakia, EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, pp.375–378.

Guppy-Coles K., Prasad S., Hillier S., Smith K., Lo A., Sippel J., Biswas N., Dahiya A., Atherton J., 2015. Accuracy of an operator-independent left ventricular ejection fraction quantification algorithm (Auto LVQ) with three-dimensional echocardiography: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Heart, Lung and

Circulation, 24(3), pp.S319–S320.

Haralick, R. M., 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of The IEEE, 67(5), pp.786-804

Lamouche G., Kennedy B. F., Bisaillon C. E., Curatolo A., Campbell G., Pazos V., Sampson D. D., 2012. Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Optics Express, 3(6), pp.1381–1398.

Louise M. C., Andrew J. F., Jacinta E. B., 2010. Novel tissue mimicking materials for high frequency breast ultrasound phantoms. Ultrasound in medicine and biology, 37(1), pp.122-135

Maitz, M. F., 2015. Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine. Biosurface and Biotribology, 1(3), pp.161–176.

Mary M. G., 1975. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 4(2), pp.172–179.

Meyers M. A., Chen P., Lopez M. I., Seki Y., Lin A. Y. M., 2011. Biological materials: a materials science approach. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 4(5), pp.626–657.

Molinari F., Caresio C., Acharya U. R., Mookiah M. R. K., Minetto M. A., 2015. Advances in quantitative muscle ultrasonography using texture analysis of ultrasound images. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 41(9), pp.2520–2532.

Nailon W. H., 2012. Texture analysis methods for medical image characterisation, Youxin Mao, ed. Biomedical Imaging, InTech, DOI:10.5772/8912, pp.75–100.

Qasim A. & Raina A., Retrieved August 2017 from Echocardiographer.org website, http://www.echocardiographer.org/ index.html

Rostyslav B., Karthikayan B., Grant T G., James P O., US Patent 8 535 061 B2, 2009. Human torso phantom for

imaging of heart with realistic modes of cardiac and respiratory motion.

Selvarajah S. & Kodituwakku S. R., 2011. Analysis and comparison of texture features for content based image retrieval. International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, 2(1), pp.108–113.

Shirotani T., 1988. Realistic torso phantom for calibration of in-vivo transuranic-nuclide counting facilities. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 25(11), pp.875–883.

Soslow R. A., Dannenberg A. J., Rush D., Woerner B. M., Khan K. N., Masferrer J., Koki A. T., 2000. COX-2 is expressed in human pulmonary, colonic, and mammary tumors. Cancer, 89(12), pp.2637–2645.

Zell K., Sperl J. I., Vogel M. W., Niessner R., Haisch C., 2007. Acoustical properties of selected tissue phantom materials for ultrasound imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 52(20), pp.475–484.

Downloads

Published

17-12-2017