Worker’s behaviour in manufacturing industry: An evidence from a minimum spanning tree

Authors

  • Shamshuritawati Sharif
  • Maman A. Djauhari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v8n1.373

Keywords:

Adjacency matrix, Complex system, Distance matrix, Kruskal’s algorithm, Network topology,

Abstract

A manufacturing industry contributes around 10% Malaysian economic. It provides economic opportunities for related industries and business. However, the number of accidents in manufacturing sector, including fatal accidents, has been increased from time to time. We analyze worker’s behaviour to understand the real situation. The method developed in econophysics has been used to transform the correlation structure into sub-dominant ultrametric structure. Its corresponding minimum spanning tree and the centrality measure are performed in order to identify the most influential variables.

References

Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2011, Jun 17). Malaysia Economic Report 2010/2011 [Online]. Available : http://www.treasury.gov.my.

Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia (2011, January 20). Statistics [Online]. Available: http://ww.dosh.gov.my.

P. Jayawant, and K. Glavin, Involve a journal of mathematics, 2(4) (2009), 439–450.

H. Djauhari, Safety Culture at a manufacturing Industry in Johor Malaysia. M.S. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, (2010). [5] T. Krichel, and N. Bakkalbasi, “A Social Network Analysis of Research Collaboration in the Economics Community,” presented at the International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting, France, (2006).

R. N. Mantegna, European Physical Journal B, 11 (1999), 193-197.

S. Miccichè, G. Bonanno, F.Lillo, and R.N. Mantegna, Physica A, 324 (2003), 66–73.

K. Park, and A. Yilmaz, “A Social Network Analysis Approach to Analyze Road Networks,” presented at the ASPRS Annual Conference. San Diego, CA, (2010).

R. N. Mantegna, and H. E. Stanley, An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, (2000).

V. Batagelj, and A. Mrvar, “A Density based approaches to network analysis: Analysis of Reuters terror news network,” presented at the Ninth Annual ACM SIGKDD, Washington, D.C, (2003).

M. De Nooy, A. Mvrar, and V. Batagelj, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, London, (2004).

V. Batagelj, and A. Mrvar, (2011, January 6). PAJEK: Program for Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks, version 2.02. [Online]. Available : http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php?id=download. [13] T. Kamada, and S. Kawai, Information Processing Letters, 31 (1) (1989), 7–15.

Y. Xu, J. Ma, Y. Sun, J. Hao, Y. Sun, and Y. Zhao, “Using Social Network Analysis As A Strategy For E-Commerce Recommendation,” presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), India , (2009).

A. Abbasi, and J. Altmann, “On the Correlation between Research Performance and Social Network Analysis Measures Applied to Research Collaboration Networks,” TEMEP Discussion Paper, No.2010, Seoul National University, Korea, (2010).

J. Monárrez-Espino, and J. R. Caballero-Hoyos, Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporaneas. 16(32) (2010), 155-171.

L. Freeman, Sociometry, 40 (1977), 35–41

S.P. Borgatti, Connections, 18(1) (1995), 112-114.

P. Sieczka, and J.A. Holyst, Physica A, 388 (2009), 1621-1630.

J.B. Kruskal, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7(1) (1956), 48-50.

Downloads

Published

03-08-2015