Recommendations for Protective Actions Based on Projected Public Health Risks Following a Postulated Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Authors

  • Maryna Batur Graduate School, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkiye
  • Reha Metin Alkan Department of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkiye
  • Himmet Karaman Department of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Istanbul, Turkiye
  • Haluk Ozener Department of Geodesy, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Bogazici University, 34684, Istanbul, Turkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v20n4.3561

Keywords:

Hypothetical accident, gaussian plume, nuclear hazard mapping, emergency response, protective actions.

Abstract

This study conducted a regional assessment of the environmental and health consequences due to the release of radionuclides, including the most harmful, such as Cs-137 and I-131, from a hypothetical reactor accident at the first Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant, in Turkiye under different meteorological conditions. Simulations of the atmospheric flow were done using a Gaussian-based probabilistic model. Based on the estimated air and land contamination, radiation doses and cancer risks to the population were calculated. The assessment results were then compared with the criteria for protective actions in the event of a radioactive release and were subsequently used to assess the sufficiency of the Precautionary Action Zone (PAZ) and Urgent Protective Zone (UPZ) provided by regulations. The assessment indicated that evacuation outside the UPZ would likely be required during the early phase of the emergency, while sheltering indoors might be necessary up to 80 km. Protective actions such as restrictions on being outdoors or iodine prophylaxis are needed far beyond the radius of the UPZ. These results provide important insights into safe protective measures to reduce the risk of radiation-related cancer when considering a hypothetical severe nuclear accident. In addition, the results of this study aim to improve the current nuclear emergency response program and support nuclear decision-making. 

References

Longmuir, C., & Agyapong, V. I. O. (2021). Social and mental health impact of nuclear disaster in survivors: A narrative review. Behavioral Sciences, 11(8), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11080113

Takebayashi, Y., Lyamzina, Y., Suzuki, Y., & Murakami, M. (2017). Risk perception and anxiety regarding radiation after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant accident: A systematic qualitative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111306

Cléro, E., Ostroumova, E., Demoury, C., & others. (2021). Lessons learned from Chernobyl and Fukushima on thyroid cancer screening and recommendations in case of a future nuclear accident. Environment International, 146, 106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106230

Akiba, S. (2012). Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionizing radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture: A preliminary review of current plans. Journal of Radiological Protection, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/1

Batur, M., & Alkan, R. M. (2023). What can we learn from past nuclear accidents? A comparative assessment of emergency response to accidents at the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants. Advanced Land Management, 3(2), 76–89.

Saindane, S. S., Murali, S., Dhole, S. D., & Karmalkar, N. K. (2021). Planning, preparedness, and response to nuclear/radiological emergency. Radiation Protection and Environment, 44(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/rpe.rpe_9_21

Handl, G. (2016). Nuclear off-site emergency preparedness and response: Some international legal aspects. In J. Black-Branch & D. Fleck (Eds.), Nuclear non-proliferation in International Law-Volume III (pp. 229–245). T M C Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-138-8_11

Dadda, A., Bouali, B., Bouam, A., Dahia, A., & Cheridi, A. L. D. (2024). Source term analysis and impact study during a hypothetical accident in Haiyang nuclear power plant. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 111542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111542

Bacchi, V., & Tassi, P. (2019). Three-dimensional modeling of radionuclides dispersion in a marine environment with application to the Fukushima Dai-ichi case. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 24, 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9614-6

Kumar, A., Rout, S., Chopra, M. K., & others. (2011). Modeling of Cs-137 migration in cores of marine sediments of Mumbai Harbor Bay. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 301, 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3116-z

Yasunari, T. J., Stohl, A., Hayano, R. S., Burkhart, J. F., Eckhardt, S., & Yasunari, T. (2011). Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19530–19534. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112058108

Chai, T., Draxler, R., & Stein, A. (2015). Source term estimation using air concentration measurements and a Lagrangian dispersion model: Experiments with pseudo and real cesium-137 observations from the Fukushima nuclear accident. Atmospheric Environment, 106, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.070

Kovalets, I. V., Talerko, M., Synkevych, R., & Koval, S. (2022). Estimation of Cs-137 emissions during wildfires and dust storm in Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in April 2020 using ensemble iterative source inversion method. Atmospheric Environment, 288, 119305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119305

Tang, Z., Cai, J., Li, Q., & Zhao, J. (2019). The regional scale atmospheric dispersion of radionuclide I-131: A simulation method based on WRF-Chem model. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 156, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.10.029

Leelőssy, Á., Mészáros, R., & Lagzi, I. (2011). Short and long term dispersion patterns of radionuclides in the atmosphere around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 102(12), 1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.07.010

Muhamad, L. H., Karim, M. A., Chew, M. T., Kechik, M. M. A., Shah, N. M., Ibahim, M. J., & Saeed, I. M. (2023). Atmospheric dispersion and dose assessment of Cs-137 and I-131 from hypothetical incidents of nuclear power plant in Southeast Asia. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 208, 110941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110941

Omar, N., Koh, M. H., & Hashmin, S. (2019). Radiological dose assessment due to hypothetical nuclear power plant operation in Mersing, Johor, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 15(4), 532–536. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v15n4.1397

ElShafeey, N., Eid, M. M., Mahmoud, A. S., & Zakey, A. S. (2023). Risk assessment of possible hazards of El Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant using FLEXPART model. Engineering Proceedings, 31(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13964

Rakesh, P. T., Reddy, B. R., Srinivas, C. V., Shekhar, S. R., Venkatesan, R., Gopalakrishnan, V., & Venkatraman, B. (2021). Validation of a modified FLEXPART model for short-range radiological dispersion and dose assessments in ONERS decision support system. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 136, 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103739

Birikorang, S. A., Abrefah, R. G., Sogbadji, R. B. M., Nyarko, B. J. B., Fletcher, J. J., & Akaho, E. H. K. (2015). Ground deposition assessment of radionuclides following a hypothetical release from Ghana Research Reactor-1 (GHARR-1) using atmospheric dispersion model. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 79, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.11.013

Ahangari, R., & Noori-Kalkhoran, O. (2019). A study of the protective actions for a hypothetical accident of the Bushehr nuclear power plant at different meteorological conditions. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 58, 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-018-00775-w

Oboo, M., & Kim, J. (2024). Radiological consequence assessment from long term station blackout nuclear accident on Buyende nuclear power plant of Uganda. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 199, 110366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110366

Shiuli, S. S., Khaer, M. A., Islam, M. M., & others. (2022). Assessment of radiological safety and emergency response of VVER-1200 type reactor. International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology, 4(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jandt.2022.04.002

Bektaş, S., & Lüle, S. Ş. (2022). An integrated method for atmospheric dispersion and corresponding risks: Application to ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 143, 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104039

Tsabaris, C., Eleftheriou, G., Tsiaras, K., & Triantafyllou, G. (2022). Distribution of dissolved Cs-137, I-131, and Pu-238 at eastern Mediterranean Sea in case of hypothetical accident at the Akkuyu nuclear power plant. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 251, 106964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106964

Abbasi, A., Zakaly, H. M., & Almousa, N. (2023). Radiotoxic fission products and radiological effects in the Mediterranean Sea biota from a hypothetical accident in Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 193, 115166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115166

Bilgic, E., & Gunduz, O. (2020). Dose and risk estimation of Cs-137 and I-131 released from a hypothetical accident in Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 211, 106082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106082

Agbulut, U., Ceylan, I., Gurel, A. E., & Ergun, A. (2021). The history of greenhouse gas emissions and relation with the nuclear energy policy for Turkey. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 42(12), 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1563818

Aydın, C. I. (2020). Nuclear energy debate in Turkey: Stakeholders, policy alternatives, and governance issues. Energy Policy, 136, 111041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111041

Akar, A. U., Uyan, M., & Yalpir, S. (2023). Spatial evaluation of the nuclear power plant installation based on energy demand for sustainable energy policy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03061-y

Turkish Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. (2019). Ulusal Radyasyon Acil Durum Plani (URAP).

Iban, M. C., & Sahin, E. (2022). Monitoring land use and land cover change near a nuclear power plant construction site: Akkuyu case, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(10), 724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10437-6

Hu, T., & Yoshie, R. (2020). Effect of atmospheric stability on air pollutant concentration and its generalization for real and idealized urban block models based on field observation data and wind tunnel experiments. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 207, 104380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104380

Mensah, A. D., Terasaki, A., Aung, H. P., Toda, H., Suzuki, S., Tanaka, H., Onwona-Agyeman, S., Omari, R. A., & Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D. (2020). Influence of soil characteristics and land use type on existing fractions of radioactive Cs-137 in Fukushima soils. Environments, 7(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7020016

Fairuz, A., & Sahadath, M. H. (2020). Assessment of the potential total effective dose (TED) and ground deposition (GD) following a hypothetical accident at the proposed Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 158, 109043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109043

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Report by the Director General. IAEA.

Malizia, A., Chierici, A., Biancotto, S., & others. (2021). The HOTSPOT code as a tool to improve risk analysis during emergencies: Predicting I-131 and Cs-137 dispersion in the Fukushima nuclear accident. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 11(4), 437–486. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110421

Bellamy, M. B., Dewji, S. A., Leggett, R. W., & others. (2019). External exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil. Federal Guidance Report, 15, 402.

Sandal, E. K., Adiguzel, F., & Karademir, N. (2020). Changes in land use between the years of 1990–2018 in Mersin province based on CORINE (Coordination of Information on the Environment) system. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences, 6(1), 8–18.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2011). Criteria for use in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency: General safety guide. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). (1992). Principles for intervention for protection of the public in a radiological emergency (ICRP Publication 63).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2017). Protective action guides and planning guidance for radiological incidents. Radiation Protection Division.

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024