Analytical approximation solution for logistic delay differential equation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v16n3.1516Keywords:
Logistic delay differential equation, homotopy analysis method (HAM), homotopy perturbation method (HPM).Abstract
Although the non-linear analytical techniques are fast developing, they still do not entirely satisfy mathematicians and engineers. Many researchers have conducted the study to find the analytical solution for the logistic delay differential equation. However, for the time lags occasion, it is quite hard and tough to achieve analytical solution due to its limitation, and thus, we can only expect the approximate analytical solution. This paper describes the approximate analytical techniques, homotopy analysis method (HAM), and homotopy perturbation method (HPM) in order to indicate their ability in solving the logistic delay differential equation. HAM is one of the better approaches that can be used for solving this equation. The use of HAM will lead to obtaining the series solution that contains an auxiliary parameter that can help to adjust and control the convergence and rate approximation for the series solution. Meanwhile, HPM is an analytical method with a combination of homotopy in topology and classical perturbation technique. Using the HPM technique, the logistic delay differential equation is reduced to a sufficiently simplified form, which usually becomes a linear equation that is easy to be solved. The comparison of numerical solution with -values of HAM has shown the influence of parameter in the convergence of series solution. Using HAM and HPM, the relationship between the time-delay τ and the population size is obtained. As a result, the higher the value of the steeper the gradient of the population size . It is concluded that the parameter helps to adjust and control the convergence and rate approximation for the series solution of HAM. Laterally, the comparison between HAM and HPM with numerical method is done to show that both methods are relatively approximate to the exact solution. Moreover, homotopy perturbation method (HPM) is a special case of homotopy analysis method (HAM) when and . Hence, using HAM and HPM techniques, two different kinds of series solutions of logistic delay differential equation are obtained.
References
Abolhasani, M., Ghaneai, H. and Heydari, M. 2016. Modified homotopy perturbation method for solving delay differential equations. Appl. Sci. Rep 16 (2), 89-92.
Alomari A. K., Noorani M. S. M. and Nazar, R. 2009. Solution of delay differential equation by means of homotopy analysis method. Acta Appl Math., 108(2), 395-412.
Chowdhury M. S. H, Hashim I., and Abdulaziz O. 2009. Comparison of homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method for purely nonlinear fin-type problems. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation , 14(2), 371–378.
He, J. H. 2000. A coupling method of a homotopy perturbation technique for nonlinear problems. International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics, 35(1), 37-43.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1948. Circular causal systems in ecology. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 50(4), 221–246.
Julien, A., Lin, W., and Gail, S. K. W. 2005. An alternative formulation for a delayed logistic equation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241(1), 109–119.
Lakshmanan, S., Rihan, F. A., Rakkiyappan, R., and Park, J. H. 2014. Stability Analysis of the differential genetic regulatory networks model with time-varying delays and markovian jumping parameters. Nonlinear
Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 14, 1-15.
Liao, S. J. 1992. The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 34(4), 759-778.
Liao, S. J. 1997. Boundary element method for general nonlinear differential operators. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Element, 20(2), 91-99.
Liao, S. J. 2003. Beyond Perturbation: Introduction to Homotopy Analysis Method. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Boca Raton.
Liao, S. J. 2005. Comparison between the homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169(2), 1186–1194.
MacLean, M. C. and Willard Turner, A. 1937. The logistic curve applied to canada’s population. Canadian Journal Economy Political Sciences, 3(2), 241–248.
Olvera, D., El ́ıas-Zu ́n ̃iga, A., Lo ́pez de Lacalle, L. and Rodr ́ıguez, C. 2015. Approximate solutions of delay differential equations with constant and variable coefficients by the enhanced multistage homotopy perturbation method. Abstract and Applied Analysis. Hindawi, vol. 2015.
Pearl, R. and Reed, L. J. 1930. The logistic curve and the census count of 1930. Science, 72 (1868), 399–401.
Pearl, R., Reed, L. J. and Fish, J. F. 1940. The logistic curve and the census count of 1940. Science 92 (2395), 486–488.
Rihan, F. A., Abdel rahman, D.H., Lakshmanan, S. and Alkhajeh, A. S. 2014. A time delay model of tumor-immune system interactions: Global dynamics, parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 232, 606-623.
Rihan, F. A., Azamov, A. A., Al Sakaji, H. J. 2018, An inverse problem for delay differential equations: Parameter estimation, nonlinearity and sensitivity. Applied Matematics and Information Science, 12(1), 63-74.
Rihan, F. A, Tunc, C.,Saker, S. H, Lakshmanan, S. and Rakkiyappan, R. 2018. Application of delay differential equations in biological systems. Complexity, Vol. 2018.
Ruan, S. 2006. Delay differential equations in single species dynamics. Delay Differential Equation and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
Tsoularis A. and Wallace J. 2002. Analysis of logistic growth models. Mathematical Bioscience, 179(1), 21–55.
Yin, X. -B., Kumar, S. and Kumar, D. 2015. A modified homotopy analysis method for solution of fractional
wave equations. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(12).
