Synthesis and characterization of coconut pith char adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Keywords:Coconut, Carbon dioxide, Char, Adsorbent, Adsorption
The emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) from anthropogenic sources has become a public concern. Several effective and affordable post combustion CO2 capture technology has been reported and one of the approaches is through adsorption process. This study focused the adsorption onto low-cost adsorbent that can be produced from waste biomass through carbonization method. Coconut pith (CP) was used as precursor and carbonized at temperature of 300 and 700ºC under ambient condition. The chemical and physical properties showed that the surface area, pore volume, ash, moisture and carbon content of chars increased, while the yield content decreased with increasing carbonization temperatures. The char adsorbent carbonized at higher temperature (CP700) showed the better performance with CO2 adsorption capacity of 10.00 mmol/g at 25ºC. It was revealed that carbonization temperature greatly affects the properties of CP, hence influence the ability of the adsorbent to capture the CO2. Hence, these unique properties and adsorption performance showed that char adsorbent enable to be used as an effective adsorbent for CO2 capture and thus improving environmental quality and sustainability.
Chen, X., Chen, G., Chen, L., Chen, Y., Lehmann, J., McBride, M. B., & Hay, A. G. (2011). Adsorption of copper and zinc by biochars produced from pyrolysis of hardwood and corn straw in aqueous solution. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8877–8884.
Creamer, A. E., & Gao, B. (2016). Carbon-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture: A critical review. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(14), 7276–7289.
ASTM International. (2011). Standard test method for chemical analysis of wood charcoal (D1762-84). Retrieved from https://www.astm.org/
Ello, A. S., De Souza, L. K. C., Trokourey, A., & Jaroniec, M. (2013). Coconut shell-based microporous carbons for CO2 capture. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 180, 280–283.
Fuente-Cuesta, A., Diaz-Somoano, M., Lopez-Anton, M. A., Cieplik, M., Fierro, J. L. G., & Martínez-Tarazona, M. R. (2012). Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 23–28.
Hornbostel, M. D., Bao, J., Krishnan, G., Nagar, A., Jayaweera, I., Kobayashi, T., & Dubois, L. (2013). Characteristics of an advanced carbon sorbent for CO2 capture. Carbon, 56, 77–85.
Johari, K., Alias, A. S., Saman, N., Song, S. T., & Mat, H. (2015). Removal performance of elemental mercury by low-cost adsorbents prepared through facile methods of carbonisation and activation of coconut husk. Waste Management & Research, 33(1), 81–88.
Johari, K., Saman, N., Song, S. T., Cheu, S. C., Kong, H., & Mat, H. (2016). Development of coconut pith chars towards high elemental mercury adsorption performance - Effect of pyrolysis temperatures. Chemosphere, 156, 56–68.
Kim, K., Son, Y., Lee, W. B., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Moving bed adsorption process with internal heat integration for carbon dioxide capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 13–24.
Kim, Y. E., Moon, S. J., Yoon, Y. I., Jeong, S. K., Park, K. T., Bae, S. T., & Nam, S. C. (2014). Heat of absorption and absorption capacity of CO2 in aqueous solutions of amine containing multiple amino groups. Separation and Purification Technology, 122, 112–118.
Lee, S. Y., & Park, S. J. (2015). A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 23, 1–11.
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014). An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 426–443.
Li, G., Shen, B., Li, F., Tian, L., Singh, S., & Wang, F. (2015). Elemental mercury removal using biochar pyrolyzed from municipal solid waste. Fuel Processing Technology, 133, 43–50.
Min, F., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., & Pan, W. (2011). An experimental investigation into the gasification reactivity and structure of agricultural waste chars. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 92(1), 250-257.
Qian, L., Zhang, W., Yan, J., Han, L., Gao, W., Liu, R., & Chen, M. (2016). Effective removal of heavy
metal by biochar colloids under different pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 206, 217–224.
Rashidi, N. A., & Yusup, S. (2016). An overview of activated carbons utilization for the post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 13, 1–16.
Rout, J., Tripathy, S. S., Nayak, S. K., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2001). Scanning electron microscopy study of chemically modified coir fibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 79(7), 1169–1177.
Rupesh, S., Muraleedharan, C., & Arun, P. (2015). A comparative study on gaseous fuel generation capability of biomass materials by thermo-chemical gasification using stoichiometric quasi-steady-state model. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 6(4), 375–384.
Scholes, C. A., Ho, M. T., Wiley, D. E., Stevens, G. W., & Kentish, S. E. (2013). Cost competitive membrane-cryogenic post-combustion carbon capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 341–348.
Singh, V. K., & Kumar, E. A. (2016). Measurement and analysis of adsorption isotherms of CO2 on activated carbon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 97, 77–86.
Tran, H. N., You, S.-J., & Chao, H.-P. (2016). Effect of pyrolysis temperatures and times on the adsorption of cadmium onto orange peel derived biochar. Waste Management & Research, 34(2), 129–138.
Tripathi, M., Sahu, J. N., & Ganesan, P. (2016). Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 467–481.
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011). CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: Current status and new trends. Energy and Environmental Science, 4(1), 42–55.
Zhang, X., He, X., & Gundersen, T. (2013). Post-combustion carbon capture with a gas separation membrane: Parametric study, capture cost, and exergy analysis. Energy and Fuels, 27(8), 4137–4149.