Greater effect of contrast polarities on visual acuity measurements using chart with shorter wavelength background

Authors

  • Chen Ai Hong Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Nurulain Muhamad Universiti Teknologi MARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v14n4.1134

Keywords:

Contrast polarity, Contrast ratio, Colour, Visual acuity

Abstract

Our study aimed to explore the effect of positive and negative polarities on visual acuity measurements by utilizing black and white as a text against background with three distinct colours. Visual acuity was recorded as logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) using the detection of the gap in a four-position Landolt-C. The 2x3 (polarity x background color) two way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction between polarity and colour background on visual resolution [F (2, 16) = 23.704, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.744]. Among the three primary background colour, shorter-wavelength (blue background) showed statistically significant findings between both positive and negative polarity [F (1, 9) = 39.875, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.818].  Visual acuity measurements improved with negative polarity but decreased with positive polarity with blue colour background. However, visual acuity was not statistically significantly different with the green (medium-wavelength) [F (1, 11) = 0.625, p = 0.446, η2 = 0.053] and the red (long-wavelength) backgrounds [F (1, 9) = 4.021, p = 0.856, η2 = 0.000]. In conclusion, black text against shorter-wavelength (blue) background apparently more difficult to be resolved by human eyes compared with white text. These findings suggest colour element might be an advantage for negative polarity colour combinations.

Author Biographies

Chen Ai Hong, Universiti Teknologi MARA

Optometry and Vision Science Research Center (iROViS), Faculty of Health Sciences

Nurulain Muhamad, Universiti Teknologi MARA

Optometry and Vision Science Research Center (iROViS), Faculty of Health Sciences

References

Bailey, I. L. (2006). Visual acuity. In Borish’s Clinical Refraction (Second Edi, p. 217). Butterworth Heinemann.

Bailey, I. L., Bullimore, M. A., Raasch, T. W., & Taylor, H. R. (1991). Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 32(2), 422–432.

Boyce, P. R. (2014). Human Factors in Lighting. CRC Press (3rd Editio). Taylor & Francis Group.

Buchner, A., & Baumgartner, N. (2007). Text - background polarity affects performance irrespective of ambient illumination and colour contrast. Ergonomics, 50(7), 1036–1063.

Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11.

Fang, P., & Liu, Y. F. (2017). Energy channeling LED driver technology to achieve flicker-free operation with true single stage power factor correction. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 32(5), 3892–3907.

Green, D. G., Powers, M. K., & Banks, M. S. (1980). Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity. Vision Research, 20(10), 827–835.

Humar, I., Gradisar, M., Turk, T., & Erjavec, J. (2008). The impact of color combinations on the legibility of a Web page text presented on CRT displays. Applied Ergonomics, 38, 885–899.

Humar, I., Gradisar, M., Turk, T., & Erjavec, J. (2014). The impact of color combinations on the legibility of text presented on LCDs. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 1510–1517.

Hung, G. K., & Ciuffreda, K. J. (2002). Neural Models of Motion Perception. In Models of the Visual System (pp. 487–519). Kluwer Academic.

Knoblauch, K., Arditi, A., & Szlyk, J. (1991). Effects of chromatic and luminance contrast on reading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8(2), 428.

Legge, G. E., Parish, D. H., Luebker, A., & Wurm, L. E. E. H. (1990). Psychophysics of Reading : XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7(10), 2002–2010.

Legge, G. E., Rubin, G. S., & Luebker, A. (1987). Psychophysics of reading: V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research, 27(7), 1165–1177.

Ling, J., & Schaik, P. Van. (2002). The effect of text and background colour on visual search of Web pages. Displays, 23, 223–230.

Lombardo, M., & Lombardo, G. (2010). Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 36(2), 313–331.

Millodot. (2009). Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science (7th Edition). Butterworth Heinemann.

Nadler, M. P., Miller, D., & Nadler, D. (1990). Glare and Contrast Sensitivity for Clinicians.

Pelli, D. G., & Bex, P. (2013). Measuring contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 90, 10–14.

Piepenbrock, C., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2014). Smaller pupil size and better proofreading performance with positive than with negative polarity displays. Ergonomics, 57(11), 1670–1677.

Piepenbrock, C., Mayr, S., Mund, I., & Buchner, A. (2013). Positive display polarity is advantageous for both younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 56(7), 1116–24.

Rachel V. North. (2001). Visual performance. In Work and the Eye (Second Edi, pp. 1–17). Butterworth Heinemann.

Robertson, A. R. (1977). The CIE 1976 Color-Difference Formulae, 2(1), 7–11.

Santos, R. L. dos., Rufino, D. M., de Morais, M. B. M., & Sa, E. M. (2017). A charge-pump led driver with PFC and low-frequency-flicker reduction. 2017 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP), 1–7.

Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599.

Schrauf, M., & Stern, C. (2001). The visual resolution of Landolt-C optotypes in human subjects depends on their orientation: The “gap-down” effect. Neuroscience Letters, 299, 185–188.

Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Visual Perception A Clinical Orientation (4th Editio). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sheedy, J. E., Bailey, I. L., & Raasch, T. W. (1984). Visual Acuity and Chart Luminance. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 61(9), 595–600.

Suresh, K. (2011). An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(1), 8–11.

Tinker, M. A., & Paterson, D. G. (1931). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading VII. Variations in color of print and background, 246–251.

Wang, A., & Chen, M. (2000). Effects of polarity and luminance contrast on visual performance and VDT display quality. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25, 415–421.

Westheimer, G. (2003). Visual Acuity with Reversed-Contrast Charts : I. Theoretical and Psychological Investigations. Optometry and Vision Science, 80(11), 745–748.

Westheimer, G., Chu, P., Huang, W., Tran, T., & Dister, R. (2003). Visual Acuity with Reversed-Contrast Charts : II. Clinical Investigation. Optometry and Vision Science, 80(11), 749–752.

Woods, R. L., & Wood, J. M. (1995). The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice, 43–57.

Downloads

Published

14-01-2019