Characteristics of coconut frond as a potential feedstock for biochar via slow pyrolysis

Authors

  • Nur Syairah Mohamad Aziz Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Adilah Shariff Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Nurhayati Abdullah Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Nurhidayah Mohamed Noor Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v14n4.1014

Keywords:

Biomass, coconut frond, feedstock, properties

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of coconut frond as a feedstock for biochar production via slow pyrolysis process.  Proximate, elemental and thermogravimetric analysis were performed to evaluate the chemical and thermal properties of the coconut frond.  The percentage of its lignocellulosic component and high heating value were determined. Surface morphology of coconut frond was examined using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Coconut frond (CF) contains 78.03±3.91 d.b. wt% of volatile matter, 4.96±0.07 d.b. wt% of ash content and 17.01±3.86 d.b. wt% of fixed carbon. Elemental analysis revealed a sulfur content of 0.94±0.12 %, while the percentage of nitrogen is 0.46±0.33%. The composition of carbon and hydrogen are 34.0±6.22 % and 7.71±0.34 % respectively. The high heating value of CF is 17.77±0.40 MJ/kg. CF consists of 43.91±1.80 % cellulose, 31.58±1.20 % hemicellulose, and 18.15±0.60 % lignin. From thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, it is apparent that the weight loss of CF occurred prominently in the temperature range 200°C - 400°C.  The peaks of the DTG curve at 281.75±0.35 °C and 334.08±0.35°C indicate the weight loss of coconut frond sample due to the degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose, respectively. The FESEM images of CF show its fibrous strands are compact with a few large pores with diameters around 42.5 - 48.1 μm large pores in the center of the CF sample. The results of the analysis show that CF has a potential as a feedstock for biochar production via slow pyrolysis. CF also can be used in other application such as syngas and bio-oil production due to the low lignin percentage and high volatile percentage.

Author Biographies

Nur Syairah Mohamad Aziz, Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Nur Syairah Mohamad Aziz currently is a Ph.D student at School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia. She obtained B.Sc (Physics) and M.Sc (Physics) from Universiti Sains Malaysia. Her research interest includes biomass, slow pyrolysis and biochar characterization. 

Adilah Shariff, Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Adilah Shariff is an Associate Professor at the School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.  She is the Head of Energy Studies  Programme and Coordinator of the Energy Laboratory. Adilah graduated her Ph.D from University College of Wales, Swansea, UK in 1995.  She received her Masters of Engineering degree in Renewable Energy Studies from Universiteit of Leuven, Belgium in 1984 and B.Sc. Hons. Physics from Sheffiled University, UK in 1980.  Adilah is active in the renewable energy research especially in biomass and bioenergy and has supervised many postgraduate students at the Masters and Ph.D level

Nurhayati Abdullah, Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Nurhayati Abdullah is a lecturer at School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Aston University, UK, MSc in Solid State Physics from Universiti Sains Malaysia and BSc in Physics from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Her research interest includes pyrolysis, biomass and bioenergy. 

Nurhidayah Mohamed Noor, Energy Studies Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Nurhidayah currently is a Ph.D student at School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia. She obtained B.Sc (Physics) and M.Sc (Physics) from Universiti Sains Malaysia. Her research interest includes biomass, biochar characterization and slow pyrolysis

References

Abdullah, N., & Bridgwater, A. V. 2006. Pyrolysis liquid derived from oil palm empty fruit bunches. Journal of Physical Science 17(2): 117–129.

Ahiduzzaman, M., & Sadrul Islam, A. K. M. 2016. Preparation of porous bio-char and activated carbon from rice husk by leaching ash and chemical activation. SpringerPlus 5(1): 1248.

ASTM. 1977. Method of Test for Alpha Cellulose in Wood D1103-60. United States: ASTM International.

ASTM. 1978. Method of Test for Holocellulose in Wood D1104-56. United States: ASTM International.

ASTM. 2006a. Standard test method for moisture analysis of particulate wood fuels E871-82. New York: ASTM International.

ASTM. 2006b. Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis of particulate wood fuels E872-82. United States: ASTM International.

ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for ash in biomass E1755-01. United States: ASTM International.

ASTM. 2013a. Standard test method for acid-insoluble lignin in wood D1106-96. United States: ASTM International.

ASTM.2013b. Standard Test Method for gross calorific value of coal and coke D5865-13. United States: ASTM International.

Brassard, P., Godbout, S., & Raghavan, V. 2016. Soil biochar amendment as a climate change mitigation tool: Key parameters and mechanisms involved. Journal of environmental management 181(Supplement C): 484-497.

Cagnon, B., Py, X., Guillot, A., Stoeckli, F., & Chambat, G. 2009. Contributions of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin to the mass and the porous properties of chars and steam activated carbons from various lignocellulosic precursors.

Bioresource Technology 100(1),: 292-298.

Carrington, D. 2017. Fossil fuel burning set to hit record high in 2017, scientists warn. https://http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/13/fossil-fuel-burning-set-to-hit-record-high-in-2017-

scientists-warn [21 November 2017].

CEC. 2014. Burning agricultural waste: A source of dioxins. Montreal, Canada. Fact sheet from Commissions for Environmental Cooperation.

Demirbas, A. 2005. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 31(2): 171-192.

Collard, F.-X., & Blin, J. 2014. A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: Mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38: 594-608.

Demirbas, A. 2006. Production and characterization of bio-chars from biomass via pyrolysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 28(5): 413-422.

Demirbas, A., & Arin, G. 2002. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Sources 24(5): 471-482.

DP CleanTeach. 2017. Understanding coconut as a biomass fuel. http://www.dpcleantech.com/download-file/2017-06-07-00-44-14pdf [21 November 2017].

Eom, I.-Y., Kim, K.-H., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, S.-M., Yeo, H.-M., Choi, I.-G., & Choi, J.-W. 2011. Characterization of primary thermal degradation features of lignocellulosic biomass after removal of inorganic metals by diverse solvents. Bioresource Technology 102(3): 3437-3444.

Fan, Y., Fowler, G. D., & Norris, C. 2017. Potential of a pyrolytic coconut shell as a sustainable biofiller for styrene–butadiene rubber. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 56(16): 4779-4791.

FAO. 2017. Crops Statistic. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ - data/QC [22 November 2017].

Gómez, N., Rosas, J. G., Cara, J., Martínez, O., Alburquerque, J. A., & Sánchez, M. E. 2016. Slow pyrolysis of relevant biomasses in the Mediterranean basin. Part 1. Effect of temperature on process performance on a pilot scale. Journal of Cleaner Production 120: 181-190.

Gupta, N. K., Prakash, P., Kalaichelvi, P., & Sheeba, K. N. 2016. The effect of temperature and hemicellulose-lignin, cellulose-lignin, and cellulose-hemicellulose on char yield from the slow pyrolysis of rice husk. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 38(10): 1428-1434.

Howard, T. 2011. The effect of biochar on the root development of corn and soybeans in minnesota soil and sand. Retrieved from http://www.biocharinternational.org/sites/default/files/T_Howard_Science_Paper.pdf [20 May 2018].

Jones, J. M., Lea-Langton, A. R., Ma, L., Pourkashanian, M., & Williams, A. 2014. Combustion of solid biomass: Classification of fuels. In Pollutants Generated by the Combustion of Solid Biomass Fuels, pp. 9-24. London: Springer London.

Kabir, G., Mohd Din, A. T., & Hameed, B. H. 2017. Pyrolysis of oil palm mesocarp fiber and palm frond in a slow-heating fixed-bed reactor: A comparative study. Bioresource Technology 241(Supplement C): 563-572.

Khalifa, N., & Yousef, L. F. 2015. A short report on changes of quality indicators for a sandy textured soil after treatment with biochar produced from fronds of date palm. Energy Procedia 74: 960-965.

Lee, Y., Park, J., Ryu, C., Gang, K. S., Yang, W., Park, Y.-K., Jung, J., Hyun, S. 2013. Comparison of biochar properties

from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500 °C. Bioresource Technology 148(0): 196-201.

Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. 2015. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (ed.), Biochar for Environmental Management Science, Technology and Implementation Second Edition, pp. 1-14. New

York: Routledge.

Li, W., Yang, K., Peng, J., Zhang, L., Guo, S., & Xia, H. 2008. Effects of carbonization temperatures on characteristics of porosity in coconut shell chars and activated carbons derived from carbonized coconut shell chars. Industrial Crops and Products 28(2): 190-198.

Li, X. 2004. Physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of bamboo and its utilization potential for fiberboard manufacturing. MSc Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

Mahmood, W. M. F. W., Ariffin, M. A., Harun, Z., Ishak, N., Ghani, J. A., & Ab Rahman, M. N. 2015. Characterisation and potential use of biochar from gasified oil palm wastes. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 10 (Spec. Issue on 4th International Technical Conference (ITC) 2014): 45-54.

McAloon, C. 2017. Coconut faces a looming global supply shortage, but could an Australian industry crack it. http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2017-08-26/australians-love-coconuts-so-should-we-grown-our-own/8834012 [21 November 2017].

Nhuchhen, D. R., & Abdul Salam, P. 2012. Estimation of higher heating value of biomass from proximate analysis: A new approach. Fuel 99: 55-63.

Njoku, V. O., Islam, M. A., Asif, M., & Hameed, B. H. 2014. Preparation of mesoporous activated carbon from coconut frond for the adsorption of carbofuran insecticide. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 110(0): 172-180.

Noor, N.M., Shariff, A., & Abdullah, N., 2012. Slow pyrolysis of cassava wastes for biochar production and characterization. Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment (IJEE) 3: 60-65.

NOAA. 2017. Is sea level rising? https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/ facts/sealevel.html [21 November 2017].

Parikh, J., Channiwala, S. A., & Ghosal, G. K. 2005. A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid

fuels. Fuel 84(5): 487-494.

Pechyen, C., Atong, D., Aht-Ong, D., & Sricharoenchaikul, V. 2007. Investigation of pyrolyzed chars from physic nut waste for the preparation of activated carbon. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering 1(4): 498-507.

Qu, T., Guo, W., Shen, L., Xiao, J., & Zhao, K. 2011. Experimental study of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50(18): 10424-10433.

Raghavan, K. 2010. Biofuels from coconuts. Wageningen, Netherlands.

Rahman, A. A., Abdullah, N., & Sulaiman, F. 2014. Temperature effect on the characterization of pyrolysis products from oil palm fronds. Advances in Energy Engineering 2(1): 14-21.

Ronsse, F. 2016. Biochar Production. In V. J. Bruckman, E. A. Varol, B. B. Uzun, & J. Liu (ed.). Biochar: A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation, pp. 199-226. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Shafizadeh, F. 1985. Pyrolytic reactions and products of biomass. In Overend, R. P., Milne, T. A. & Mudge, L. K. (ed.), Fundamentals of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, pp. 183-217. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Shariff, A., Aziz, N. S. M., & Abdullah, N. 2014. Slow pyrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunches for biochar production and characterization. Journal of Physical Science 25(2): 97-112.

Shariff, A., Aziz, N. S. M., Salleh, N. M., & Ruzali, N. S. I. 2016. The effect of feedstock type and slow pyrolysis temperature on biochar yield from coconut wastes. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering 10(12): 1361-1365.

Sheng, C., & Azevedo, J. L. T. 2005. Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(5): 499-507.

Sun, H., Hockaday, W. C., Masiello, C. A., & Zygourakis, K. (2012). Multiple controls on the chemical and physical structure of biochars. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 51(9): 3587-3597.

Thies, J. E., Rillig, M. C., & Graber, E. R. 2015. Biochar effects on the abundance, activity and diversity of the soil biota. In J. Lehmann & S. Jospeh (ed.), Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation Second Edition, pp. 327-389. New York: Routledge.

Tomas, U.-G. J. 2013. Recycling of waste coconut shells as substitute for aggregates in mix proportioning of concrete hollow blocks. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 9(4): 290-300.

Tsai, W. T., Chang, C. Y., Lee, S. L., & Wang, S. Y. 2001. Thermogravimetric analysis of corn cob impregnated with zinc chloride for preparation of activated carbon. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 63(2): 351-357.

Tsamba, A. J., Yang, W., & Blasiak, W. 2006. Pyrolysis characteristics and global kinetics of coconut and cashew nut shells. Fuel Processing Technology 87(6): 523-530.

US Department of Energy. 2017. International Energy Outlook 2017. https://http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/ [19 September 2017].

Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. 2010. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel 89(5): 913-933.

Watts, J. 2017. Global atmospheric CO2 levels hit record high. https://http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/oct/30/global-atmospheric-co2-levels-hit-record-high [21 November 2017].

World Meteorological Organization. 2017. Greenhouse gas concentrations surge to new record. https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/greenhouse-gas-concentrations-surge-new-record [22 November 2017].

Yang, H., Yan, R., Chin, T., Liang, D. T., Chen, H., & Zheng, C. 2004. Thermogravimetric analysis−fourier transform infrared analysis of palm oil waste pyrolysis. Energy & Fuels 18(6): 1814-1821.

Yon, R. 2016. Revival of coconut industry in Malaysia. http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/files/ap_policy/806/806_1.pdf [21 November 2017].

Downloads

Published

16-12-2018